This article introduces "Spin," a new Metaflow feature that significantly improves the iterative development experience for ML/AI engineers. It allows faster experimentation and debugging, bridging the gap between workflow orchestrators and interactive notebooks.
Shashank Srikanth, Romain Cledat
Metaflow — a framework we started and open-sourced in 2019 — now powers a wide range of ML and AI systems across Netflix and at many other companies. It is well loved by users for helping them take their ML/AI workflows from prototype to production, allowing them to focus on building cutting-edge systems that bring joy and entertainment to audiences worldwide.
Metaflow allows users to:
Metaflow works with many battle-hardened tooling to address the second point — among them Maestro, our newly open-sourced workflow orchestrator that powers nearly every ML and AI system at Netflix and serves as a backbone for Metaflow itself.
In this post, we focus on the first point and introduce a new Metaflow functionality, Spin, that helps users accelerate their iterative development process. By the end, you’ll have a solid understanding of Spin’s capabilities and learn how to try it out yourself with Metaflow 2.19.
To understand our approach to improving the ML and AI development experience, it helps to consider how these workflows differ from traditional software engineering.
ML and AI development revolves not just around code but also around data and models, which are large, mutable, and computationally expensive to process. Iteration cycles can involve long-running data transformations, model training, and stochastic processes that yield slightly different results from run to run. These characteristics make fast, stateful iteration a critical part of productive development.
This is where notebooks — such as Jupyter, Observable, or Marimo — shine. Their ability to preserve state in memory allows developers to load a dataset once and iteratively explore, transform, and visualize it without reloading or recomputing from scratch. This persistent, interactive environment turns what would otherwise be a slow, rigid loop into a fluid, exploratory workflow — perfectly suited to the needs of ML and AI practitioners.
Because ML and AI development is computationally intensive, stochastic, and data- and model-centric, tools that optimize iteration speed must treat state management as a first-class design concern. Any system aiming to improve the development experience in this domain must therefore enable quick, incremental experimentation without losing continuity between iterations.
At first glance, Metaflow code looks like a workflow — similar to Airflow — but there’s another way to look at it: each Metaflow @step serves as a checkpoint boundary. At the end of every step, Metaflow automatically persists all instance variables as artifacts, allowing the execution to resume seamlessly from that point onward. The below animation shows this behavior in action:
In a sense, we can consider a @step similar to a notebook cell: it is the smallest unit of execution that updates state upon completion. It does have a few differences that address the issues with notebook cells:
While Metaflow’s resume feature can approximate the incremental and iterative development approach of notebooks, it restarts execution from the selected step onward, introducing more latency between iterations. In contrast, a notebook allows near-instant feedback by letting users tweak and rerun individual cells while seamlessly reusing data from earlier cells held in memory.
The new spin command in Metaflow 2.19 addresses this gap. Similar to executing a single notebook cell, it quickly executes a single Metaflow @step — with all the state carried over from the parent step. As a result, users can develop and debug Metaflow steps as easily as a cell in a notebook.
The effect becomes clear when considering the three complementary execution modes — run, resume, and spin — side by side, mapping them to the corresponding notebook behavior:
Another major difference isn’t just what gets executed, but what gets recorded. Both run and resume create a full, versioned run with complete metadata and artifacts, while spin skips tracking altogether. It’s built for fast, throw-away iterations during development.
The one-minute clip below illustrates a typical iterative development workflow that alternates between run and spin. In this example, we are building a flow that reads a dataset from a Parquet file and trains a separate model for each product category, focusing on computer-related categories.
As shown in the video, we start by creating a flow from scratch and running a minimal version of it to persist test artifacts — in this case, a Parquet dataset. From there, we can use spin to iterate on one step at a time, incrementally building out the flow, for example, by adding the parallel training steps demonstrated in the clip.
Once the flow has been iterated on locally, it can be seamlessly deployed to production orchestrators like Maestro or Argo, and scaled up on compute platforms such as AWS Batch, Titus, Kubernetes and more. Thus, the experience is as smooth as developing in a notebook, but the outcome is a production-ready, scalable workflow, implemented as an idiomatic Python project!
Instead of typing run and spin manually in the terminal, we can bind them to keyboard shortcuts. For example, the simple metaflow-dev VS Code extension (works with Cursor as well) maps Ctrl+Opt+R to run and Ctrl+Opt+S to spin. Just hack away, hit Ctrl+Opt+S, and the extension will save your file and spin the step you are currently editing.
One area where spin truly shines is in creating mini-dashboards and reports with Metaflow Cards. Visualization is another strong point of notebooks but the combination of spin and cards makes Metaflow a very compelling alternative for developing real-time and post-execution visualizations. Developing cards is inherently iterative and visual (much like building web pages) where you want to tweak code and see the results instantly. This workflow is readily available with the combination of VSCode/Cursor, which includes a built-in web-view, the local card viewer, and spin.
To see the trio of tools — along with the VS Code extension — in action, in this short clip we add observability to the train step that we built in the earlier example:
A major benefit of Metaflow Cards is that we don’t need to deploy any extra services, data streams, and databases for observability. Just develop visual outputs as above, deploy the flow, and wehave a complete system in production with reporting and visualizations included.
Spin does more than just run code — it also lets us take full control of a spun @step’s inputs and outputs, enabling a range of advanced patterns.
In contrast to notebooks, we can spin any arbitrary @step in a flow using state from any past run, making it easy to test functions with different inputs. For example, if we have multiple models produced by separate runs, we could spin an inference step, supplying a different model run each time.
We can also override artifact values or inject arbitrary Python objects — similar to a notebook cell — for spin. Simply specify a Python module with an ARTIFACTS dictionary:
ARTIFACTS = {
"model": "kmeans",
"k": 15
}and point spin at the module:
spin train --artifacts-module artifacts.py
By default spin doesn’t persist artifacts, but we can easily change this by adding --persist. Even in this case, artifacts are not persisted in the usual Metaflow datastore but to a directory-specific location which you can easily clean up after testing. We can access the results with the Client API as usual — just specify the directory you want to inspect with inspect_spin:
from metaflow import inspect_spin
inspect_spin(".")
Flow("TrainingFlow").latest_run["train"].task["model"].data
Being able to inspect and modify a step’s inputs and outputs on the fly unlocks a powerful use case: unit testing individual steps. We can use spin programmatically through the Runner API and assert the results:
from metaflow import Runner
with Runner("flow.py").spin("train", persist=True) as spin:
assert spin.task["model"].data == "kmeans"
In addition to speeding up development for humans, spin turns out to be surprisingly handy for coding agents too. There are two major advantages to teaching AI how to spin:
Metaflow users are already using Claude Code; spin makes this even easier. In the example below, we added the following section in a CLAUDE.md file:
## Developing Metaflow code
Follow this incremental development workflow that ensures quick iterations
and correct results. You must create a flow incrementally, step by step
following this process:
1. Create a flow skeleton with empty `@step`s.
2. Add a data loading step.
3. `run` the flow.
4. Populate the next step and use `spin` to test it with the correct inputs.
5. `run` the flow to record outputs from the new step.
5. Iterate on (4–5) until all steps have been implemented and work correctly.
6. `run` the whole flow to ensure final correctness.
To test a flow, run the flow as follows
```
python flow.py - environment=pypi run
```
Do this once before running `spin`.
As you are building the flow, you `spin` to test steps quickly.
For instance
```
python flow.py - environment=pypi spin train
```
Just based on these quick instructions, the agent is able to use spin effectively. Take a look at the following inspirational example that one-shots Claude to create a flow, along the lines of our earlier examples, which trains a classifier to predict product categories:
In the video, we can see Claude using spin around the 45-second mark to test a preprocess step. The step initially fails due to a classic data science pitfall: during testing, Claude samples only a small subset of data, causing some classes to be underrepresented. The first spin surfaces the issue, which Claude then fixes by switching to stratified sampling — and finally does another spin to confirm the fix, before proceeding to complete the task.
To circle back to where we started, our motivation for adding spin — and for creating Metaflow in the first place — is to accelerate development cycles so we can deliver more joy to our subscribers, faster. Ultimately, we believe there’s no single magic feature that makes this possible. It takes all parts of an ML/AI platform working together coherently — spin included.
From this perspective, it’s useful to place spin in the context of other Metaflow features. It’s designed for the innermost loop of model and business-logic development, with the added benefit of supporting unit testing during deployment, as shown in the overall blueprint of the Metaflow toolchain below.
In this diagram, the solid blue boxes represent different Metaflow commands, while the blue text denotes decorators and other features. In particular, note the Shared Functionality box — another key focus area for us over the past year — which includes configuration management and custom decorators. These capabilities let domain-specific teams and platform providers tailor Metaflow to their own use cases. Following our ethos of composability, all of these features integrate seamlessly with spin as well.
Another key design philosophy of Metaflow is to let projects start small and simple, adding complexity only when it becomes necessary. So don’t be overwhelmed by the diagram above. To get started, install Metaflow easily with
pip install metaflow
and take your first baby @steps for a spin! Check out the docs and for questions, support, and feedback, join the friendly Metaflow Community Slack.
We would like to thank our partners at Outerbounds, and particularly Ville Tuulos, Savin Goyal, and Madhur Tandon, for their collaboration on this feature, from initial ideation to review, testing and documentation. We would also like to acknowledge the rest of the Model Development and Management team (Maria Alder, David J. Berg, Shaojing Li, Rui Lin, Nissan Pow, Chaoying Wang, Regina Wang, Seth Yang, Darin Yu) for their input and comments.
Supercharging the ML and AI Development Experience at Netflix was originally published in Netflix TechBlog on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
Continue reading on the original blog to support the author
Read full articleThis shows how to optimize high-scale Java services using the JDK Vector API. It highlights that algorithmic changes like matrix multiplication require cache-friendly data layouts and SIMD acceleration to overcome JNI overhead and GC bottlenecks in production environments.
MediaFM demonstrates how to scale multimodal foundation models for long-form video. By fusing audio, visual, and text signals with temporal context, it enables nuanced content understanding that improves recommendation cold starts, ad placement, and automated asset creation.
Scaling LLM post-training requires solving complex distributed systems problems like GPU synchronization. This framework allows engineers to focus on model innovation rather than infrastructure, enabling faster iteration on domain-specific AI experiences at scale.
Translating natural language to complex DSLs reduces friction for subject matter experts interacting with massive, federated datasets. This approach bridges the gap between intuitive human intent and rigid technical schemas, improving productivity across hundreds of enterprise applications.